<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Article Marketing Suck</title>
	<link>http://www.team-schuman.com/blog/does-article-marketing-suck/</link>
	<description>This is a blog about how to make money online.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Fred -Article Marketing Dojo</title>
		<link>http://www.team-schuman.com/blog/does-article-marketing-suck/#comment-56404</link>
		<author>Fred -Article Marketing Dojo</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 20:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.team-schuman.com/blog/does-article-marketing-suck/#comment-56404</guid>
		<description>A lot of people throw that "____ doesn't work" card on article marketing because they target the wrong keywords and/or fail to differential strategies between a submission for direct traffic and one where the primary driver is SEO.  

I also find that most people are very narrow in how they present their product, choosing the most plainly obvious thing to write about.  If they looked as basic comparative and contrasting principles, the world would open up to them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people throw that &#8220;____ doesn&#8217;t work&#8221; card on article marketing because they target the wrong keywords and/or fail to differential strategies between a submission for direct traffic and one where the primary driver is SEO.  </p>
<p>I also find that most people are very narrow in how they present their product, choosing the most plainly obvious thing to write about.  If they looked as basic comparative and contrasting principles, the world would open up to them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

